north and south elizabeth gaskell sparknotes

The impact of North & South, 10 Years Laterįalling for Mr. 'Be Your Own Heroine' by Sophie and Charlotte Andrewsīeing thrown from Paradise - for the betterĬonfessions of a limited Richard Armitage fan How to recognize a Victorian marriage proposal The search for home in North and South - Margaret's quest Is there a future for published N&S fanfic?Ĭelebrating Ten Years of published ‘North and South’ Fan Fiction

Margaret Hale and Elizabeth Bennet: still relevant role models? Where are the bonnets in North and South?

The sweltering summers of 'North and South'Ĭaptain Wentworth & John Thornton and the agony of devotion The healing effect of nature in 'North and South' Higgins' wife and Hannah's husband: the missing spouses of North and South Does Gaskell need to bring out more how much Thornton has changed? The conversation during the London dinner party elaborates upon how much Thornton’s ideals have evolved since he began working with Higgins. She knows he has a heart and has full faith in his character. What elements of the story do some readers suppose are rushed? Does Margaret need more time to convince herself that the Milton manufacturer has a heart? I don’t see her keeping track of Thornton’s progress in the realm of master-worker relations or wishing he were kinder and more compassionate. In fact, one could even argue that Gaskell dwelled on Margaret’s time in London and Helstone – apart from Thornton – a little too long.

There’s so much more that could be told! But I’m satisfied that the story leading to this moment is complete. Many of Georgette Heyer’s famed Regency romance novels end exactly in this same manner, leaving the reader to divine how everything will work out once the lovers are clearly set upon a short path to matrimony. No long discussions over past regrets, no letting us see how Hannah reacts, not even a mention of Fred, who caused more trouble than we could have ever first conceived. And when they finally kiss, that’s it – story’s over. We spend all that time and anguish waiting for our lovers to come together.

There’s no real debate as to whether or not her ending is abrupt. The difference, I believe, is in the reader’s interpretation of the story itself. There is truth in the matter of her being initially rushed, however, I think a distinction ought to be made between whether the plot or character development of Gaskell’s story was permanently damaged or if the story is developed well but ends somewhat abruptly. Too often, I believe, the assumption is that Dickens’ editorial deadlines adversely affected Gaskell’s ability to bring the story to a satisfactory conclusion. I’ve been noting these kinds of comments for some time and have been mulling over what it is that people are really trying to say about Elizabeth Gaskell’s work when they mention her ending.

North and south elizabeth gaskell sparknotes